Ethiopia has suffered
some of the worst land degradation in sub-Saharan Africa. The major source of
Ethiopia’s deteriorating landscape is rapid population increase that has
contributed to deforestation, soil erosion, and wide-scale agriculture. Land
degradation in Ethiopia has severely reduced the productive capacity of the
land an its economic value. It has been estimated that Ethiopia loses $4.3B
worth of productivity annually due to the declining biocapacity of its land.
However, efforts have been underway for decades now to restore the land and
protect vulnerable communities. Over the last 10 years, Ethiopia has spent
$1.2B per year in land rehabilitation projects focused on reducing soil erosion
and runoff throughout the country. Recently the International Center of
Tropical Agriculture (CIAT) has examined the impact of Ethiopia’s ecological
efforts.
Researchers at CIAT have
noted Ethiopia’s efforts as being beneficial for the natural ecosystems but
remain critical that each ecosystem requires different solutions. Ethiopia has
been primarily focused on agricultural conservation and stone structures to protect
the soil and thus resulting in higher crop yields. It has been discovered that
these techniques used separately have little effect on land restoration leading
to the conclusion that agricultural conservation and intervening stone
structures need to be used together to substantially improve the land. The
Ethiopian Strategic Investment Framework has been dedicated to using these
methods in tandem while millions of trees have also been planted by communities
over the last several decades. Various efforts have cut soil loss and runoff in
half in some cases, but they have failed to closely monitor their efforts which
results in lack of information when enacting new initiatives to restore other
ecosystems.
Despite improvement in decreased runoff in restored
landscapes, Ethiopia’s water runoff on a national scale has worsened over the
years. A useful measure in determining the level of a landscape’s degradation
is to determine the amount runoff that is occurring. If more runoff is
occurring in one landscape over another, this means that soil in one landscape
has a lower ability to store water than the other. Conclusively, the landscape
with more runoff has a higher need for vegetation and should take priority. Ethiopia
has shown significant commitment to restoring its landscape but the environmental
and economic benefits could be even greater.
its so sad that such large areas are getting ruined, i wish there was a faster way to fix this issue
ReplyDeleteI think it is terrible that large areas in Ethiopia is getting ruined by population increase. People need to realize what we are doing is terrible for the environment and we need to know our limits and use resources in a sustainable way.
ReplyDelete